2003 SEAT — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check
Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.
Vehicle details
- Make & model
- SEAT
- Year
- 2003
- Fuel
- DIESEL
- Colour
- BLACK
- Engine
- 1896 cc
- Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Untaxed
- MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Not valid
- MOT due
- was due 14 June 2017
- Last recorded mileage
- 44,376 mi
AI verdict AVOID 43/100
AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.
This 2003 Seat has 16 MOT tests on record with a 62% pass rate and 44,376 miles. The vehicle is currently untaxed and has no valid MOT, making it unroadworthy and uninsurable.
The vehicle shows high usage at 12,177 miles/year, with a significant 2009 service gap and inconsistent annual mileage readings.
Things to check
- Six major MOT failures across 16 tests, indicating persistent and recurring mechanical issues.
- Brake system failures and advisories are a recurring pattern, suggesting chronic neglect.
- Lighting system failures and advisories are also a recurring pattern, indicating chronic neglect.
- The vehicle is currently untaxed and has no valid MOT, making it unroadworthy and uninsurable.
Working in its favour
- Most recent MOT passed despite 6 historical failures
- The vehicle has a 5-star Euro NCAP safety rating, indicating a strong safety record for its age.
- The car has a consistent, high annual mileage, suggesting regular use and potential reliability in certain conditions.
- The vehicle has a long, unbroken MOT history, providing a complete picture of its past mechanical performance.
Mileage history
MOT test history — 10/16 passed
| Date | Result | Mileage | Defects & advisories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2006 | PASS | 44,376 mi | None recorded |
| Jul 2007 | PASS | 57,404 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Nov 2008 | FAIL | 75,250 mi |
FAIL Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3) FAIL Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8) FAIL Offside Headlamp aim aimed so that it dazzles other road users (1.8.A.1a) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Nov 2008 | PASS | 75,250 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| May 2010 | FAIL | 93,870 mi |
PRS Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.5c) FAIL Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g) FAIL Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g) ADVISORY Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c) ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| May 2010 | PASS | 93,871 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c) ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Jun 2011 | FAIL | 107,262 mi |
FAIL Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b) FAIL Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b) FAIL Centre Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) FAIL Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2) FAIL Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a) FAIL Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
|
| Jun 2011 | PASS | 107,262 mi | None recorded |
| Jun 2012 | FAIL | 121,369 mi |
FAIL Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b) FAIL Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a) FAIL Nearside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a) FAIL Offside Rear coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a) ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Jun 2012 | PASS | 121,369 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| May 2013 | PASS | 131,839 mi |
ADVISORY Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
|
| Jun 2014 | FAIL | 143,640 mi |
FAIL Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b) FAIL Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b) FAIL Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b) FAIL Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a) FAIL Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a) FAIL Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d) FAIL Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
|
| Jun 2014 | PASS | 143,640 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
|
| Jun 2015 | PASS | 155,256 mi |
ADVISORY Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c) ADVISORY Front Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Rear Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) USER ENTERED front tyres deteriorated USER ENTERED nearside rear tyre deteriorated
|
| Jun 2016 | FAIL | 163,769 mi |
FAIL Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) FAIL Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a) FAIL Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) FAIL Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) ADVISORY Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
|
| Jun 2016 | PASS | 163,875 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a) ADVISORY Underbody corrosion
|
About this page
This page shows public vehicle data for registration BU03 WRJ, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.