2003 FORD — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check
Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.
Vehicle details
- Make & model
- FORD
- Year
- 2003
- Fuel
- DIESEL
- Colour
- BLUE
- Engine
- 1753 cc
- Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Untaxed
- MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Not valid
- MOT due
- was due 13 November 2016
- Last recorded mileage
- 70,256 mi
AI verdict CAUTION 60/100
AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.
This 2003 Ford has 13 MOT tests on record with a 69% pass rate and 70,256 miles. While it has a valid MOT, the vehicle's age and high usage warrant careful consideration.
The vehicle shows high annual usage, averaging 16,039 miles per year, with a notable spike in 2014-2015 to 22,288 miles annually.
Things to check
- Recurring suspension failures and advisories (e.g., Oct 2009, Oct 2012) indicate ongoing wear.
- High annual mileage (16,039 mi/yr) compared to UK average (8,000 mi/yr) suggests more wear.
- Oct 2010 retest shows a 0-mileage increase between initial fail and pass, suggesting a possible odometer anomaly.
- Oct 2015 MOT shows 205,918 miles, but the 2014-2015 spike is unusually high for a 2003 diesel.
Working in its favour
- Vehicle has a valid MOT certificate, indicating it is currently roadworthy.
- No recent major failures or advisories on the most recent MOT (Oct 2015).
- Consistent high mileage suggests regular use and maintenance, potentially extending component life.
- No evidence of outstanding finance (HPI check needed) or write-off markers in the provided data.
Mileage history
MOT test history — 9/13 passed
| Date | Result | Mileage | Defects & advisories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2007 | PASS | 70,256 mi |
USER ENTERED offside front fog light damaged
|
| Mar 2008 | PASS | 79,527 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Inner Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Apr 2009 | FAIL | 93,268 mi |
FAIL Nearside Front coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Oct 2009 | FAIL | 102,118 mi |
FAIL Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b) FAIL Nearside Front coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a) FAIL Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Oct 2009 | PASS | 102,155 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Oct 2010 | FAIL | 120,155 mi |
FAIL Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f) FAIL Nearside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2) FAIL Offside Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2) ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Oct 2010 | PASS | 120,155 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Oct 2011 | PASS | 137,135 mi | None recorded |
| Oct 2012 | FAIL | 148,543 mi |
FAIL Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
|
| Oct 2012 | PASS | 148,543 mi | None recorded |
| Nov 2013 | PASS | 166,147 mi | None recorded |
| Nov 2014 | PASS | 188,435 mi | None recorded |
| Oct 2015 | PASS | 205,918 mi | None recorded |
About this page
This page shows public vehicle data for registration BT53 EVK, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.