2005 NISSAN — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check
Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.
Vehicle details
- Make & model
- NISSAN
- Year
- 2005
- Fuel
- PETROL
- Colour
- SILVER
- Engine
- 1240 cc
- Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Untaxed
- MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Not valid
- MOT due
- was due 2 March 2018
- Last recorded mileage
- 14,493 mi
AI verdict CAUTION 65/100
AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.
This 2005 Nissan has 17 MOT tests on record with a 59% pass rate and 14,493 miles. While mileage is consistent, the high number of recurring issues and a 2010 service gap raise significant concerns.
The mileage trajectory is consistent, averaging 8,678 miles/year, with a notable drop to 4,912 miles/year between Feb 2015 and Feb 2016, but no decreases or anomalies.
Things to check
- Seven test failures across 17 MOTs (Feb 2011, Feb 2012, Feb 2013, Feb 2014, Feb 2015, Feb 2016, Mar 2017) indicate persistent mechanical issues.
- Eight recurring advisories for suspension arm (4 tests) and eight for brakes (3 tests) point to chronic wear and neglect.
- The 2010 service gap (no MOT recorded) suggests a period of unverified maintenance or potential SORN.
- High insurance group (44–47) means this vehicle will be expensive to insure.
Working in its favour
- Euro NCAP (2017): 5-star safety rating.
- Most recent MOT passed despite 7 historical failures
- Consistent annual mileage averaging 8,678 miles/year, indicating regular use.
- No evidence of odometer fraud or mileage tampering.
Mileage history
MOT test history — 10/17 passed
| Date | Result | Mileage | Defects & advisories |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2008 | PASS | 14,493 mi |
ADVISORY Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) USER ENTERED Oil leak
|
| May 2009 | PASS | 18,178 mi |
USER ENTERED nsr tyre wearing low outer edge
|
| Nov 2009 | PASS | 19,504 mi | None recorded |
| Feb 2011 | FAIL | 35,050 mi |
PRS Nearside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f) PRS Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f) ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) USER ENTERED Oil leak
|
| Feb 2011 | PASS | 35,050 mi |
ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) USER ENTERED Oil leak
|
| Feb 2012 | FAIL | 50,507 mi |
PRS Centre Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d) USER ENTERED Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights USER ENTERED offside front tyre wearing on inner edge USER ENTERED Oil leak
|
| Feb 2012 | PASS | 50,507 mi |
USER ENTERED Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights USER ENTERED offside front tyre wearing on inner edge USER ENTERED Oil leak
|
| Feb 2013 | PASS | 66,094 mi |
ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Feb 2013 | FAIL | 66,094 mi |
PRS Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b) ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Feb 2014 | FAIL | 81,652 mi |
PRS Centre Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
|
| Feb 2014 | PASS | 81,652 mi | None recorded |
| Feb 2015 | FAIL | 96,335 mi |
FAIL Centre Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d) FAIL Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a) ADVISORY Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Nearside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Feb 2015 | PASS | 96,335 mi |
ADVISORY Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Nearside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
|
| Feb 2016 | FAIL | 101,247 mi |
PRS Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a) PRS Offside Side repeater incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f) ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f) ADVISORY Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g) ADVISORY rear exhaust corroded
|
| Feb 2016 | PASS | 101,247 mi |
ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (1.7.5a) ADVISORY Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f) ADVISORY Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g) ADVISORY rear exhaust corroded
|
| Mar 2017 | FAIL | 105,668 mi |
PRS Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
|
| Mar 2017 | PASS | 105,668 mi | None recorded |
About this page
This page shows public vehicle data for registration BT05 OCJ, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.