2002 PEUGEOT — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check
Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.
Vehicle details
- Make & model
- PEUGEOT
- Year
- 2002
- Fuel
- PETROL
- Colour
- SILVER
- Engine
- 1587 cc
- Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Untaxed
- MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Not valid
- MOT due
- was due 30 September 2016
- Last recorded mileage
- 12,762 mi
AI verdict CAUTION 61/100
AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.
This 2002 Peugeot has 13 MOT tests on record with a 77% pass rate and 12,762 miles. While it has a valid MOT, the recurring issues and low annual mileage for its age warrant careful consideration.
The mileage trajectory shows normal usage until Sep 2013, but a significant jump of 23,024 miles occurred between Sep 2012 and Sep 2013, indicating a potential period of high usage or a data anomaly.
Things to check
- Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecurely mounted (Jun 2007) — a serious suspension failure.
- Nearside Rear coil spring cracked (Jun 2007) — another suspension failure.
- Unusually high mileage jump of 23,024 miles between Sep 2012 and Sep 2013 — a significant mileage anomaly.
- Recurring suspension arm advisories across multiple tests (e.g., May 2010, May 2011) — consistent wear pattern.
Working in its favour
- No major failures on the most recent MOT (Sep 2015) — current condition appears acceptable.
- Consistent annual mileage averaging 7,142 miles/year, typical for a 24-year-old vehicle.
- No dangerous defects recorded on the latest MOT test (Sep 2015).
- Euro NCAP safety rating of 4/5 stars (2018) — indicates a generally safe vehicle.
Mileage history
MOT test history — 10/13 passed
| Date | Result | Mileage | Defects & advisories |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2006 | PASS | 12,762 mi | None recorded |
| Jun 2007 | PASS | 18,959 mi | None recorded |
| Jun 2007 | FAIL | 18,959 mi |
PRS Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecurely mounted to its housing (2.5.C.1a)
|
| Jun 2008 | PASS | 24,261 mi | None recorded |
| May 2009 | PASS | 30,860 mi |
ADVISORY Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| May 2010 | PASS | 37,884 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| May 2011 | FAIL | 45,460 mi |
FAIL Horn not working (1.6.2a) FAIL Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecurely mounted to its housing (2.5.C.1a) ADVISORY Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g) ADVISORY Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| May 2011 | PASS | 45,460 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) ADVISORY Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Oct 2012 | FAIL | 52,594 mi |
FAIL Nearside Rear coil spring cracked (2.4.C.1a) FAIL Front constant velocity joint is insecure (2.5.C.1b) ADVISORY Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Oct 2012 | PASS | 52,600 mi |
ADVISORY Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
|
| Sep 2013 | PASS | 75,624 mi |
ADVISORY Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
|
| Sep 2014 | PASS | 83,726 mi | None recorded |
| Sep 2015 | PASS | 98,209 mi |
ADVISORY brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Nearside and offside rear (3.5.1i) ADVISORY Brake pad(s) wearing thin Nearside and offside rear (3.5.1g)
|
About this page
This page shows public vehicle data for registration BL02 NYV, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.