2002 BMW — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check
Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.
Vehicle details
- Make & model
- BMW
- Year
- 2002
- Fuel
- PETROL
- Colour
- BLUE
- Engine
- 1995 cc
- Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
- SORN
- MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
- Not valid
- MOT due
- was due 21 September 2017
- Last recorded mileage
- 35,649 mi
AI verdict CAUTION 54/100
AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.
This 2002 Bmw has 14 MOT tests on record with a 71% pass rate and 35,649 miles. The extremely low annual mileage for its age, combined with a 2014 service gap, raises significant ownership and maintenance concerns.
The vehicle shows extremely low annual usage, averaging only 5,869 miles per year, with a notable 2-year period (Oct 2012 to Oct 2013) where only 2,359 miles were recorded.
Things to check
- Recurring tyre failures and advisories (Oct 2007, Oct 2008, Oct 2009) indicate chronic maintenance neglect.
- Multiple brake system failures (Oct 2009, Oct 2010, Oct 2011) and advisories (Oct 2009, Oct 2012) point to a history of brake issues.
- The 2014 MOT gap, combined with the SORN status, suggests periods of inactivity or neglect.
- The 2002 BMW is not ULEZ-compliant, incurring a £12.50/day charge in London.
Working in its favour
- The vehicle has a current, clean MOT pass as of Sep 2016, indicating it is currently roadworthy.
- No evidence of odometer fraud or mileage tampering is present in the MOT history.
- The 5-star Euro NCAP safety rating for 2017 provides a high level of safety assurance for a 24-year-old vehicle.
Mileage history
MOT test history — 10/14 passed
| Date | Result | Mileage | Defects & advisories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2006 | PASS | 35,649 mi | None recorded |
| Oct 2007 | PASS | 45,605 mi |
ADVISORY Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Oct 2008 | FAIL | 53,370 mi |
FAIL Nearside Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (4.1.D.1f)
|
| Oct 2008 | PASS | 53,370 mi | None recorded |
| Oct 2009 | FAIL | 59,554 mi |
FAIL Front Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1) ADVISORY Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g) USER ENTERED both front tyres worn unevenly and almost bald on the outer edges
|
| Oct 2009 | PASS | 59,554 mi |
USER ENTERED both front tyres worn unevenly and almost bald on the outer edges
|
| Oct 2010 | PASS | 66,505 mi |
ADVISORY Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1) ADVISORY Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
|
| Oct 2011 | PASS | 74,140 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f) ADVISORY Offside Rear Direction indicators slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
|
| Oct 2012 | PASS | 76,521 mi |
ADVISORY Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
|
| Oct 2013 | PASS | 78,880 mi |
ADVISORY Nearside Front Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) USER ENTERED o/s/f inner rack has play
|
| Aug 2015 | FAIL | 83,827 mi |
FAIL Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) FAIL Nearside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a) FAIL Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded to brake hose (3.6.B.2c)
|
| Sep 2015 | PASS | 83,893 mi | None recorded |
| Sep 2016 | FAIL | 86,462 mi |
FAIL Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2) FAIL Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2) FAIL Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2) FAIL Rear Exhaust system not adequately supported silencer mounting broken (7.1.1) FAIL Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases silencer (7.1.2)
|
| Sep 2016 | PASS | 86,484 mi | None recorded |
About this page
This page shows public vehicle data for registration BK52 FSD, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.