BG52 KCA

2002 PEUGEOT — MOT History, Mileage & AI Check

Data from DVLA & DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026.

Vehicle details

Make & model
PEUGEOT
Year
2002
Fuel
PETROL
Colour
BLACK
Engine
1997 cc
Tax status (as of 11 June 2026)
Untaxed
MOT status (as of 11 June 2026)
Not valid
MOT due
was due 12 October 2009
Last recorded mileage
45,827 mi

AI verdict AVOID 42/100

AI analysis by CarGPT, generated 11 June 2026 from this vehicle's MOT record. Not professional advice — always inspect before buying.

This 2002 Peugeot has 8 MOT tests on record with a 50% pass rate and 45,827 miles. The vehicle is also currently not valid for MOT, which is a significant legal and safety concern.

The vehicle shows high annual usage (14,765 miles/yr) compared to the UK average of 8,000 miles/yr, with a notable spike in usage between 2006 and 2008.

Things to check

  • Not valid for MOT since 2009-10-12 (MOT EXPIRY DATE: 2009-10-12).
  • Recurring major failures in lights (Oct 2006 FAIL) and suspension (Oct 2006 FAIL).
  • Mileage trajectory shows high annual usage (14,765 mi/yr), well above UK average.
  • MOT history shows 4 failures and 4 passes, indicating a pattern of recurring issues.

Working in its favour

  • Euro NCAP safety rating of 4/5 stars (2018) indicates a generally safe vehicle.
  • Low insurance group (3 out of 50) means lower running costs and insurance premiums.
  • Consistent retesting pattern (immediately after failures) suggests responsive owner maintenance.
  • The vehicle has a consistent mileage history, despite being high for its age.

Mileage history

Oct 2005: 45,827 mi FAILOct 2005: 45,827 mi PASSOct 2006: 66,754 mi FAILOct 2006: 66,754 mi PASSOct 2007: 81,611 mi FAILOct 2007: 81,611 mi PASSOct 2008: 99,720 mi FAILOct 2008: 99,720 mi PASS100k73k46kOct 2005Oct 2008

MOT test history — 4/8 passed

DateResultMileageDefects & advisories
Oct 2005 FAIL 45,827 mi
PRS Front registration plate character(s) likely to be misread (6.3.4b)
Oct 2005 PASS 45,827 mi None recorded
Oct 2006 FAIL 66,754 mi
PRS Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
PRS Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
ADVISORY Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
ADVISORY Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oct 2006 PASS 66,754 mi
ADVISORY Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
ADVISORY Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oct 2007 FAIL 81,611 mi
FAIL Nearside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
FAIL Offside Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
FAIL Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
FAIL Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber mounting bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
FAIL Offside Front Suspension arm rubber mounting bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
USER ENTERED REAR NUMBER PLATE IN POOR CONDITION.NEARSIDE FRONT TYRE CLOSE TO LIMIT.
Oct 2007 PASS 81,611 mi None recorded
Oct 2008 FAIL 99,720 mi
FAIL Nearside Front Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
FAIL Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
FAIL Rear registration plate character(s) likely to be misread (6.3.4b)
USER ENTERED REAR PADS WORN 85% SOME WEAR ON REAR DISCS.FRONT PADS WORN 75-80%.HEAD LIGHTS COME ON ON THERE OWN.
Oct 2008 PASS 99,720 mi
USER ENTERED REAR PADS WORN 85% SOME WEAR ON REAR DISCS.FRONT PADS WORN 75-80%.HEAD LIGHTS COME ON ON THERE OWN.

Want the full report on BG52 KCA?

Live valuation, running costs, negotiation points and seller questions — free, in 60 seconds.

Run a free live check →

About this page

This page shows public vehicle data for registration BG52 KCA, sourced from official DVLA and DVSA records, last checked 11 June 2026. It contains no information about the vehicle's owner or keeper. The AI verdict is generated from the MOT record and known model issues; it is guidance, not a professional inspection. If you are connected to this vehicle and want this page removed, use remove my vehicle — removal is immediate.